| ... | ... | @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ Work on ELT Platform 24 give us real life experience on initial version of ELT P |
|
|
|
* New workflow limits number of stakeholders to developers responsible for Public and CCS releases.
|
|
|
|
The hope is that less stakeholders can make decisions faster and process will be more agile.
|
|
|
|
* Three phases of software lifecycle: unstable, stabilizing and stable were not respected.
|
|
|
|
* TODO go more into details about Yearly and Release streams
|
|
|
|
* The incentive to have "own" branch/fork of Platform is too high.
|
|
|
|
* TODO go more into details about cost of maintaining own fork
|
|
|
|
* End Of Life Policy is not well defined.
|
|
|
|
* Platform/ECOS/DevEnv versioning is unclear and often mixed.
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | |
