| ... | ... | @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Work on ELT Platform 24 gives us real-life feedback on the initial version of EL |
|
|
|
* Release Streams: are usually Yearly Stream branches and are further stabilized. They serve the purpose of stable environments delivered to consortia or for ECM testing. Stakeholders decide which updates are allowed.
|
|
|
|
* The incentive to have "own" branch/fork of the Platform is too high.
|
|
|
|
* Each extra branch of the ELT Platform has a maintenance cost.
|
|
|
|
* The new ELT Platform Lifecycle allows the creation of on-demand branches, but maintenance cost has to be covered by the requesting party.
|
|
|
|
* The new ELT Platform Lifecycle allows the creation of on-demand branches, but maintenance cost has to be covered by the requester.
|
|
|
|
* End Of Life Policy is not well defined.
|
|
|
|
* Platform/ECOS/DevEnv versioning is unclear and often mixed.
|
|
|
|
* Lack of easily accessible/editable release schedule produces friction.
|
| ... | ... | |
